PlagiarismCheck.org
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Plagiarism Checker
Pros and cons
Pros
- Time-saving
- Accuracy
- Ease of Use
- Grammar Correction
- Mistake Catching
- Efficiency
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54.3% |
| Mid-Market | 41.3% |
| Enterprise | 4.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Modern Interface with Strong Similarity & AI Checks and Easy PDF Reports
“We work with a lot of articles and texts both from contractors and individual writers, so it’s crucial for us to maintain the quality control. The report provides a solid scan for similarity and AI. Also underlines the error and offers better stylistics. What i like the most is e”
Quick checks with preserving the original formatting
“We order a lot of tool instructions for our blog article and we are happy that this tool preserves formatting so it’s easy to spot problematic parts and provide a quick feedback or fix them.”
Super efficient to verify press releases
“An efficient tool for news verification as well as press releases being sent to our agency. It’s crucial to check the content we receive and send because content is our main asset and it’s originality is super important.”