Stark
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in AI Accessibility Tools
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Accessibility Features
- Accessibility
- Compliance Standards
- Easy Integrations
- ADA Compliance
Cons
- Limited Features
- Expensive
- Lack of Clarity
- Subscription Limitations
- Accessibility Issues
- Limited Color Customization
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 57.3% |
| Mid-Market | 29.3% |
| Enterprise | 13.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 8 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 15 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 3.7 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Once I figured out how to use it and how nice it was, it appeared to paywall me!
“Takes font weight into account when looking at contrast for accessibility.”
Stark's Figma plugin has been a game changer for ensuring my designs meet accessibility standards
“Their Figma plugin is really user friendly when ensuring my designs meet not only WCAG but also APCA standards. It's helped me speed up my process as it's replaced extensions that I previously used through Google Chrome which took a lot longer.”
Easy to learn and understand how to use, takes care of most of the accessibility issues
“I use stark as a first choice for accessibility. I like the feature of contrast checker mainly because it gives suggestion as well if your color does not meet conformance. It has also the feature of Alt text which is very useful for conveying information to developer, It also has”