G2 Vendor Directory

ConvNetJS

by Stanford NLP Group

13

Reviews

3.8

Star rating

#8

Rank in Artificial Neural Network

Pros and cons

Pros

    Cons

      Traffic & LLM citations

      Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for ConvNetJS.

      Page views and citations · ConvNetJS

      Source: G2 review data

      Key stats

      —

      38

      Small Business

      2

      Adoption by company size

      SegmentShare of reviews
      Small Business38.5%
      Mid-Market23.1%
      Enterprise38.5%

      Quarterly history

      QuarterReviewsStar rating

      Satisfaction ratings

      Ease of Use9.4
      Ease of Setup10.0
      Quality of Support8.3
      Meets Requirements9.1

      What reviewers say

      Lacks Broader Appeal

      3.5

      “I like about ConvNetJS that it has a very strong selling point. It brings software facing hardware issues down. No installations of the software required, no expensive GPUs required, just open a tab and start training. This lowers the barrier to entry for learning because it does”

      Senior Financial Planner

      A Disorganized Tool, for Deep Learning Models in JavaScript

      1.5

      “There are problems with it as a tool. It is unable to integrate with Chrome making it unfamiliar and less user friendly. I have come across many glitches or problems. The processing speed is a bit slow.”

      Promotions Manager

      ConvNetJS

      4.5

      “It has such very sufficient features which makes easy deep learning models. As it is JavaScript library also it is a open source.”

      System engineer SAP