Checkstyle
21
Reviews
4.3
Star rating
#34
Rank in Static Code Analysis
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
—
68
Enterprise
1
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28.6% |
| Mid-Market | 14.3% |
| Enterprise | 57.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.7
Ease of Setup7.1
Quality of Support8.0
Meets Requirements8.9
What reviewers say
Easy validation of rules in CI
4.5
“Natural integration with code version control and build tools via dependency managers like maven and gradle”
Good a while back, but SonarQube already does most of the things that are needed
0.5
“Organization standards can be enforced as part of the build process. It is also relatively fast. Having a consistent standard at least makes some reviews faster because of expectations.”
Checkstyle is a must for any serious dev team.
5.0
“-Keeps devs focused on core functionality. -Keeps teams aligned in how they code. -Standards are good. -Increases the quality of code -Makes developers better.”