BugDazz API Scanner
11
Reviews
4.9
Star rating
#15
Rank in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- CD Integration
- Accuracy of Results
- CI
- Scanning Technology
- Automation
Cons
- Poor Documentation
- Lack of Information
- Difficult Learning Curve
- Learning Curve
- Lack of Guidance
- Software Bugs
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
—
100
Small Business
3
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 90.9% |
| Mid-Market | 9.1% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use9.6
Ease of Setup9.9
Quality of Support9.5
Meets Requirements9.4
What reviewers say
Good tool for security teams
4.5
“The test cases are quite good and comprehensive and the pricing fits well for regular use in our security scans. It integrates smoothly into CI/CD pipeline, and the support team comes back on reported bugs with workable fixes usually within a day or so.”
Fits right into our workflow
4.5
“It integrates really well with our CI/CD setup. The scans run automatically on certain branches and don't slow down builds.”
Reports are detailed and easy to read
5.0
“Each report includes request/response logs, issue descriptions, and remediation advice. Developers don’t need to follow up with security to act on them.”