Scraper API
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Data Extraction
Pros and cons
Pros
- Scraping Efficiency
- Features
- Data Collection
- Performance
- Ease of Use
- API Usability
Cons
- Pricing Issues
- Slow Speed
- API Limitations
- Slow Performance
- Expensive
- Billing Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 85.7% |
| Mid-Market | 14.3% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 3.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Great LLM Integration and Analytics, but Pricing Could Improve
“It's impressive that this API supports LLM-ready data, which makes it much easier for me to use with language models and quickly retrieve information. Additionally, the analytics provide a clear overview of the system's status, and the API playground simplifies testing requests c”
ScraperAPI is simple, intuitive, and does exactly as advertised.
“ScraperAPI has easy to follow documentation, great customer support, and can scrape any website with ease with using their proprietary routing system to scrape the most difficult websites. I recommend without reservation.”
Data Scrapping
“It simplifies web scraping by handling proxy management, CAPTCHAs, and browser rendering, allowing me to focus on data extraction rather than technical issues. The API integrates seamlessly into my existing code, and the speed is impressive, even for large-scale projects.”