ScaleOps
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Auto Scaling
Pros and cons
Pros
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Cost Saving
- Cost Reduction
- Easy Setup
- Cost-Effective
Cons
- Scaling Issues
- Slow Performance
- Poor Documentation
- Poor UI Design
- Difficulty in Usage
- Missing Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1.1% |
| Mid-Market | 58.6% |
| Enterprise | 40.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 66 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 16 | 4.7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Operação via console simples e confiável
“A operacao via console é bem simples e é uma ferramenta que temos bastante confianca”
ScaleOps Automates Resource Optimization and Saves Engineering Time
“What I like most about ScaleOps is that it automates resource optimization without needing constant manual tuning. I also appreciate the clear visibility into idle resources and the automated recommendations, which help save a significant amount of engineering time.”
Automação Total com Configuração Simples
“Eu gosto que o ScaleOps seja 100% automático e requer poucas configurações. Uso principalmente para automações no uso de recursos dos clusters de Kubernetes, o que nos ajuda a economizar custos. Além disso, ele tem algumas funções para troubleshooting que são muito boas. Achei a ”