SAS Risk Management
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Financial Risk Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Features
- Ease of Use
- Implementation Ease
- Solution Efficiency
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Not User-Friendly
- Poor Interface Design
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24.0% |
| Mid-Market | 39.6% |
| Enterprise | 36.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 10 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Powerful Data Mining and Analytics for Root-Cause Insights
“Data mining, analytics, reporting. we are able to root cause, key drivers”
Helpful in Critical Moments, Challenging with Large Data
“I like that SAS Risk Management helps me resolve bugs and other issues, especially when I’m in a critical situation. I use SAS programming to develop my code and create and manage medical data. The setup took me three hours, but once it was done, SAS Risk Management was very help”
Simplifying Risk Monitoring and Analysis
“What I like most is that SAS Risk Management gives a clear, centralized view of risk and makes it easier to identify potential issues early. It helps with monitoring, analysis, reporting, and making more informed decisions without relying heavily on manual processes.”