Entro Security
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) Solutions
Pros and cons
Pros
- Easy Integrations
- Monitoring
- Security
- Data Detection
- Customer Support
- Helpful
Cons
- Limited Features
- User Accessibility
- Policy Limitations
- Poor Customer Support
- UX Improvement
- Complexity
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10.5% |
| Mid-Market | 21.1% |
| Enterprise | 68.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 12 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 5 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Entro Maps Exposed Secrets to Owners for Faster Remediation
“When a traditional scanner finds an exposed API key in a CI/CD pipeline, security teams often waste days tracking down who actually created it. Entro solves this by automatically mapping every discovered secret and machine identity back to a specific human owner or development te”
Helpful tool for managing secrets
“What I like most about Entro Security is the visibility it gives us into our secrets across different environments. Instead of manually checking multiple platforms, everything is centralized in one place. For example, when we need to investigate a security alert or verify whether”
Intuitive, High-Performance Security with Strong Integrations and AI-Powered Secret Discovery
“its intuitive UI/UX, strong integrations, excellent performance, and AI-driven intelligence that automatically discovers and secures exposed secrets. It offers solid pricing/ROI by reducing manual security work, and the support and onboarding process makes it easy to adopt and sc”