QuarkXPress
303
Reviews
4.0
Star rating
#26
Rank in Desktop Publishing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Versatility
- Layout Design
- Features
- Animations
- Interface Simplicity
- Time-saving
Cons
- Steep Learning Curve
- Learning Curve
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
-100.0%
33
Small Business
2
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 80.1% |
| Mid-Market | 11.6% |
| Enterprise | 8.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 2.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.2
Ease of Setup8.7
Quality of Support8.2
Meets Requirements8.4
What reviewers say
Outdated and No Longer Industry-Relevant
2.0
“Quark in its heyday was the be-all, end all for digital layout. But, when Adobe figured out how to do the same, InDesign became the standard. I thought Quark was the easiest..... but I was wrong...”
Great page layout and compositing app
5.0
“I like Quarks method of handling typesetting over any other competitor that I have tried. It is tremendously easy to set type for page layout applications such as magazines, books or pamphlets/flyers.”
Easy..,
5.0
“Quark is simple and intuitive to use. The menu, palettes and quick keys allow me to create and finish projects swiftly. I especially live ke the ease of adding footnotes to a project.”