Pynt - API Security Testing
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Vulnerability Detection
- Security
- API Management
- Easy Integrations
- Automation
- Cybersecurity
Cons
- Complex Setup
- Setup Complexity
- Poor Interface Design
- Limited Features
- UX Improvement
- Poor Customer Support
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56.8% |
| Mid-Market | 20.5% |
| Enterprise | 22.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 11 | 4.9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 11 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 4.2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
API Security that catches critical issues
“It's easy to see Pynt's superior results compared to other vendors in the market. While most work similarly Pynt's findings are more accurate. It also shows results faster.”
API security discovery and for peace of mind
“Api solutions rarely give you a sense of confidence due to the massive blind spots you feel unaware of. Pynt provides that confidence that it discovers every end point and then alerts on critical issues. We were able to track hyper critical issues with Pynt.”
Automated and contextualAPI security testing and discovery
“Using Pynt brings clarity to the black box called APIs in our organization. We use it for API discovery, scanning API security issues, tracking, alerting and suggesting fixes to our APIs - all automated as part of our SDLC.”