proGrow alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches proGrow’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Dozuki San Luis Obispo, California | 4.4 | 210 | +0.0% | 1 | Compare |
 QAD Santa Barbara, CA | 4.8 | 668 | +22.6% | 7 | Compare |
 Fabriq Paris, FR | 4.6 | 51 | — | 2 | Compare |
 Tractian Atlanta, GA | 4.7 | 54 | -66.7% | 6 | Compare |
 L2L Salt Lake City, US | 4.3 | 216 | -100.0% | 7 | Compare |
 Factbird Copenhagen, DK | 4.5 | 63 | — | 3 | Compare |
 MaintainX, an Autodesk company San Francisco, California | 4.8 | 1,596 | -34.6% | 8 | Compare |
 Tulip Interfaces Somerville, Massachusetts, United States | 4.5 | 38 | — | 6 | Compare |
 Intellect Los Angeles, CA | 4.6 | 94 | — | 5 | Compare |
 TrueContext Incorporated Ontario, Canada | 4.4 | 441 | +575.0% | 6 | Compare |