Progress Telerik
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Component Libraries
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Component Variety
- Functionality
- Components
- Features
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Expensive
- Missing Features
- Cost Issues
- Poor Documentation
- Update Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54.3% |
| Mid-Market | 27.4% |
| Enterprise | 18.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 28 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 18 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q3 | 34 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 17 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 11 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Efficient Support and Well-Maintained Telerik UI Components
“Telerik made a big effort on UI components. Support is efficient: thay answer fast (<24h) and with solutions. Components maintenance is good.”
Acelera el Desarrollo con Facilidad
“Me gusta de Progress Telerik que ofrece una incorporación rápida y un roadmap útil. Además, aprecio que ayude a acortar el tiempo de desarrollo de software al permitirnos utilizar componentes básicos ya testeados y con funcionalidades avanzadas. También encuentro que la configura”
Honestly did not expect it to fix our resourcing mess this fast
“The resource allocation view across live projects is something our ops lead checks every single morning now without being asked. Seeing who is overloaded and who has spare capacity in real time means we stopped having the uncomfortable conversation about why something slipped aft”