Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Incident Management
- User Interface
- Automation
- Integration Support
- Easy Integrations
- Integrations
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Time Consumption
- Log Management Issues
- Poor Reporting
- Limited Customization
- Logging Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17.2% |
| Mid-Market | 31.0% |
| Enterprise | 51.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
AUTOMATE LIKE PRO
“The query language us very similar to splunk SPL and since splunj is the SIEM tool which is used by many, its very easy to migrate to xsoar”
Powerful Tool with Clean Data and Seamless Integrations
“very strong and powerfull tool, it provides nice and clean data information, entities, links, and we can intragrate a lot of tools into it to work safe and faster”
Simplifying Threat Intelligence with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
“It helps security teams cut through the noise of numerous alerts by distinguishing between high-impact threats and more common attacks. The tagging system, including Unit 42 tags, is particularly useful for this.”