OpenBOM
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Product Data Management (PDM)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- BOM Management
- CAD Integration
- Features
- Collaboration
- Intuitive
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Learning Difficulty
- Missing Features
- Poor Interface Design
- Integration Issues
- Difficult Usability
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 74.8% |
| Mid-Market | 21.8% |
| Enterprise | 3.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 42 | 4.1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 32 | 4.1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 34 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 29 | 4.1 |
| 2025 Q4 | 32 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 12 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 22 | 4.1 |
| 2026 Q3 | 33 | 4.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Promising BOM Management, Though Beginners Need Guidance
“OpenBOM has reduced my working hours. I like that the initial interface seems quite straightforward, and I find the idea of managing BOMs and component information in one place useful, especially for engineering work. I’m still exploring it and would like to learn more about its ”
Easy BOM Revision Management, Though Setup Takes Guidance
“I like that OpenBOM integrates directly with SolidWorks, making revision management and change logging very easy.”
Robust BOM Management with Great SolidWorks Integration, but UX Needs Polish
“I find OpenBOM robust. I like its catalog and its integration with SOLIDWORKS. As an admin, it’s the best solution for me, and setup was so easy.”