G2 Vendor Directory

CONTENTdm

by OCLC

26

Reviews

4.0

Star rating

#62

Rank in Digital Asset Management

Pros and cons

Pros

    Cons

      Traffic & LLM citations

      Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for CONTENTdm.

      Page views and citations · CONTENTdm

      Source: G2 review data

      Key stats

      —

      24

      Enterprise

      1

      Adoption by company size

      SegmentShare of reviews
      Small Business17.4%
      Mid-Market34.8%
      Enterprise47.8%

      Quarterly history

      QuarterReviewsStar rating

      Satisfaction ratings

      Ease of Use8.2
      Ease of Setup7.9
      Quality of Support8.3
      Meets Requirements8.7

      What reviewers say

      Secure Digital Collections Sharing

      4.5

      “CONTENTdm has a clean and easy to use interface.There are a number of customizable options to personalize the program for individual institutions. The fields can be limited to include just the ones that the institution uses most, and the OCR capability has been updated over the y”

      Collections Specialist

      Contentdm from the perspective of a public historian.

      3.5

      “This review is in regards to a Contentdm license obtained through a State Library for participation in the State's Digital Public Library. The procurement of the software was done by the library, and my organization does not pay the license fee. Adding files and collections to ”

      Reference Archivist

      Content DM Review

      4.0

      “ContentDM is an user friendly interface that easily adds content to your document management system. I was using COntentDM for description of a video collection on an university digital archive. The tagging was effortless and the content was easily integrated into the archive. ”

      Regional Information Management Coordinator