L2L
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Manufacturing Intelligence
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Efficiency
- Easy Creation
- Instruction Creation
- User Interface
Cons
- Complex Usability
- Limited Options
- Limited Features
- UX Improvement
- Missing Features
- Editing Difficulties
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8.4% |
| Mid-Market | 60.0% |
| Enterprise | 31.6% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 6 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 10 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Powerful CMMS with Room for Improvement
“I like L2L for its constant evolution and the insights it offers. I appreciate the insights that allow me to use AI to get specific data quickly.”
User-Friendly for Maintenance Reporting, Needs Location Saving
“I like L2L for its ease of use, which helps me report things efficiently. The setup was also easy, allowing me to start using it without any hassle.”
Efficient, User-Friendly Solution for Maintenance Tracking
“I find L2L easy to use. The scheduling feature is great for managing my PM's, and the operator portals are useful for viewing line efficiency. It's an all-in-one solution for tracking production histories, breakdowns, and more. I don't usually have much issue with the system.”