JMP
213
Reviews
4.5
Star rating
#11
Rank in Statistical Analysis
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Data Visualization
- Visualization
- Statistical Analysis
- User Interface
- Visual Design
Cons
- Expensive
- Limited Flexibility
- Learning Curve
- Learning Difficulty
- Limitations in Storage
- Limited Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
—
66
Enterprise
3
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32.1% |
| Mid-Market | 25.9% |
| Enterprise | 42.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.6
Ease of Setup8.8
Quality of Support8.9
Meets Requirements9.0
What reviewers say
Intuitive Visual Analytics, Powerful Tools—But Resource-Heavy and Pricey
4.5
“JMP offers a very intuitive and interactive interface for data analysis and visualization. I really like how easy it is to explore data dynamically, perform statistical tests, and create plots without needing to write code. The Design of Experiments (DOE) and predictive modeling ”
R1
4.0
“JMP best thing is its interactive data visualization it is used to quickly explore patterns and communicate insights effectively without heavy coding.”
Design your Experiments using JMP
5.0
“A custom DOE (design of experiment) with a prediction profiler is a beneficial option in JMP for researchers.”