Invicti
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Scanning Technology
- Vulnerability Detection
- Reporting Quality
- Features
- Vulnerability Identification
Cons
- Slow Scanning
- Slow Performance
- Poor Customer Support
- Technical Issues
- API Issues
- Complex Setup
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23.9% |
| Mid-Market | 29.6% |
| Enterprise | 46.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 4.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Efficient Scanning, Superb Usability
“I really appreciate the ease of use that Invicti (formerly Netsparker) offers. The user interface is great, making everything straightforward. The scanning engine stands out for producing high-quality results, especially when compared to competitors. It significantly reduces the ”
Simple Reporting Shines, But Needs Better Integration Options
“I appreciate the simplicity of the platform, especially the report generation options. These features are particularly helpful when we require different reports for various scenarios.”
Effortless Website Testing with Outstanding Support
“Invicti is simple to use and quick to set up, making it easy for me to carry out monthly website tests with hardly any hassle as each target is saved in its own profile. Over the years Invicti has become a crucial part of our workflow with me carrying out monthly scans. Also, whe”