InterSystems alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches InterSystems’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 IBM Armonk, New York, United States | 4.3 | 12,195 | -23.3% | 270 | Compare |
 The Apache Software Foundation Wakefield, MA | 4.2 | 4,216 | -58.8% | 81 | Compare |
 Amazon Web Services (AWS) Seattle, WA | 4.4 | 18,060 | -68.4% | 196 | Compare |
 MongoDB New York | 4.5 | 917 | -62.5% | 5 | Compare |
 PostgreSQL United States | 4.4 | 683 | -90.9% | 1 | Compare |
 EnterpriseDB (EDB) Bedford, US | 4.4 | 258 | +85.3% | 5 | Compare |
 Oracle Austin, TX | 4.1 | 19,663 | -55.7% | 232 | Compare |
 Cloudera Santa Clara, CA | 4.2 | 205 | +6300.0% | 17 | Compare |
 SQLite San Francisco, California | 4.3 | 262 | -100.0% | 1 | Compare |
 Couchbase San Jose, CA | 4.3 | 150 | — | 4 | Compare |