Integrity Advocate
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Online Proctoring
Pros and cons
Pros
- Documentation
- Reliability
- Customization
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
Cons
- Limited Options
- Limited Customization
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39.3% |
| Mid-Market | 46.4% |
| Enterprise | 14.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 13 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 4.9 |
| 2026 Q3 | 5 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Effortless Proctoring That Saves Time and Money
“Integrity Advocate makes exam proctoring very easy and saves us a lot of time and money. My favorite part is how easy it is to use and set up; we just followed the steps and didn’t face any issues. The overall simplicity and lack of maintenance issues have been key factors in con”
Seamless Integration with Brightspace, Occasionally Hindered by Technical Issues
“I like that Integrity Advocate is very easy to use and seamless. It integrates well with our platform, Brightspace, which makes it simple for students to access the examination part of the course. All features are inbuilt with the platform, meaning students don't have to go to a ”
Low-bandwidth proctoring that learners can navigate easily
“We’ve been using IA for over a year now, and I’ve found that they’re genuinely open to feedback and willing to make adjustments when needed. Compared with our previous proctoring software, the number of voids has dropped significantly, largely because IA requires far less bandwid”