GraphJSON alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches GraphJSON’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Neo4j San Mateo, CA | 4.5 | 149 | — | 6 | Compare |
 Redis San Francisco, CA | 4.5 | 181 | — | 7 | Compare |
 Dgraph Labs San Francisco, CA | 4.7 | 22 | — | 1 | Compare |
 Arango San Francisco, CA | 4.6 | 115 | — | 5 | Compare |
 FactNexus Sydney | 4.4 | 16 | — | 1 | Compare |
 Cayley N/A | 3.9 | 11 | — | 1 | Compare |
 Tigergraph Redwood City, CA | 4.6 | 11 | — | 1 | Compare |
 The GraphQL Foundation San Francisco, US | 3.9 | 11 | — | 1 | Compare |
 Aerospike Mountain View, CA | 4.4 | 83 | — | 7 | Compare |
 Elastic San Francisco, CA | 4.4 | 612 | +245.8% | 25 | Compare |