Fauna alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches Fauna’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Amazon Web Services (AWS) Seattle, WA | 4.4 | 18,060 | -68.4% | 196 | Compare |
 MongoDB New York | 4.5 | 917 | -62.5% | 5 | Compare |
 PostgreSQL United States | 4.4 | 683 | -90.9% | 1 | Compare |
 Arango San Francisco, CA | 4.6 | 115 | — | 5 | Compare |
 Redis San Francisco, CA | 4.5 | 181 | — | 7 | Compare |
 EnterpriseDB (EDB) Bedford, US | 4.4 | 258 | +85.3% | 5 | Compare |
 Neo4j San Mateo, CA | 4.5 | 149 | — | 6 | Compare |
 SQLite San Francisco, California | 4.3 | 262 | -100.0% | 1 | Compare |
 Aerospike Mountain View, CA | 4.4 | 83 | — | 7 | Compare |
 Couchbase San Jose, CA | 4.3 | 150 | — | 4 | Compare |