IHP
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Other Web Frameworks
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 90.5% |
| Mid-Market | 6.9% |
| Enterprise | 2.6% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 4.2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 15 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 11 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 40 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 18 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 27 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 39 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Fast, type-safe prototyping, but expect a Haskell learning curve
“We used IHP at Suma Soft to build an internal admin panel and a quick prototype. The scaffolding is blazing fast: the code generators give you working CRUD pages in minutes, so we spent our time on business logic instead of boilerplate. The auto-refresh dev server was a huge time”
Efficient and Reliable, But Latency Issues Persist
“I like using IHP because it's efficient and reliable. I also appreciate that it doesn't hang, which makes my workflow smoother. The initial setup was easy for me, which is always a bonus.”
Easy-to-Use Platform That Brings AI Capabilities Together
“What I like most about IHP is how easy it is to use, along with its clean, user-friendly interface. I also appreciate that it brings different AI capabilities together in one platform, which makes it more convenient and efficient for me to use.”