Cyver Core
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Penetration Testing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Reporting Quality
- Pentesting Efficiency
- Communication
- Customer Support
- Cybersecurity
- User Interface
Cons
- Limited Customization
- Technical Issues
- Poor Interface Design
- Slow Performance
- Poor Documentation
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 75.0% |
| Mid-Market | 20.0% |
| Enterprise | 5.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 5 | 4.9 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Streamlined Report Generation with Easy Template Imports and Scan Merging
“Report generation is completely streamlined; they even import your own in-house report templates into the platform. I also like the ability to upload huge scan outputs from tools like Nessus and then merge the findings.”
Best Pentest Reporting Platform
“I would like to share that our experience using Cyver Core has been great for our team. We have improved our report creation process, and the platform also provides many features that allow us to offer a better and more customized experience for our clients.”
The best investment we have made!
“At WardenSec, we started using Cyver Core software over two years ago and it has been the best investment we have made since we started our business. The task checklists cover every pentesting framework imaginable and help us manage our team effectively. The average reporting tim”