CVAT
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Data Labeling
Pros and cons
Pros
- Annotation Efficiency
- Quality
- Efficiency
- Ease of Use
- User Interface
- Customer Support
Cons
- Difficult Learning
- Labeling Issues
- Slow Performance
- Complexity
- Lack of Features
- Upload Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 79.4% |
| Mid-Market | 11.1% |
| Enterprise | 9.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 25 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Fast, Convenient UI with Powerful SAM Auto-Labeling and Easy Integration
“- Auto label with SAM - UI conveinent - Coloring the labels - Fast responds - CVAT API for integration to the codebase - Pricing is reasonable - Unboarding was easy”
Efficient Annotation Tool with Upload Friction
“I appreciate the available tools and the way they're formatted, including the hotkeys. Once I got the hang of the hotkeys, switching between tools and managing annotations became quite fluid. CVAT lets me manage and annotate all my data in a smooth pipeline, enabling me to comple”
Significantly Reduced Our Data Annotation Time
“It helped us reduce the time required to annotate a large amount of data.”