Coalesce
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Active Metadata Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Intuitive
- Automation
- User Interface
- Features
Cons
- UI Design Issues
- Integration Issues
- Slow Data Loading
- Poor Navigation
- Slow Performance
- Learning Curve
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12.8% |
| Mid-Market | 64.1% |
| Enterprise | 23.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 8 | 4.9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Effortless Deployment, Exceptional UI
“I like that the UI of Coalesce is great and it's very easy to use. It's also very easy to explain to nontechnical users, which is a big plus. The initial setup is always incredibly easy.”
Bulk Editing and Modular Pipelines Make Building Workflows a Breeze
“I like the bulk editing abilities the most. A close second is the modular feel when building pipelines.”
Product Offers Data Quality Analytics and Responsive Development for Changing Needs
“Best thing about Synq is that we not only get our daily operations like alerting the right owners handled, but also more analytical insight in the data health, that can be used for reporting data quality insight to c-level. Besides this the team are constantly developing on the t”