MatosSphere
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Automation
- Security
- Time-saving
- Cloud Security
- Ease of Use
- Cloud Management
Cons
- Integration Issues
- Improvement Needed
- Missing Features
- Access Control
- Limited Visibility
- Ineffective Alerts
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45.8% |
| Mid-Market | 41.7% |
| Enterprise | 12.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 6 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
An easy to use cloud security tools that helps you clearly sees, manage and protect everything.
“I have been using MatosSphere for a long time and it is a unified cloud security plateform that gives fully visiblity, compliance trackking anf threat protection across multi cloud environments in one place. it brings together infrastructure security app protection and real time ”
AI-Powered Cloud Security That Lives Up to the Hype
“My favorite thing about using MatosSphere is that it cuts straight to “here’s the real risk and here’s exactly how to fix it” across all my clouds—AWS, Azure, GCP, K8s, APIs—without making me bounce between tools. It prioritizes issues based on real context (public exposure, sens”
Enterprise-grade cloud security made simple and affordable for SMBs
“During my hands-on evaluation of MatosSphere, I found it refreshingly straightforward compared to other cloud security platforms I have tested. The unified CNNAP approach genuinely simplifies what is typically a complex multi-tool setup could monitor application security, get AI-”