CloudCover, Inc. alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches CloudCover, Inc.’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Sophos Oxfordshire | 4.6 | 2,780 | -79.1% | 28 | Compare |
 Palo Alto Networks Santa Clara, CA | 4.4 | 1,744 | +590.3% | 75 | Compare |
 Check Point Software Technologies Redwood City, CA | 4.5 | 2,882 | +7.2% | 61 | Compare |
 TrendAI Tokyo | 4.4 | 921 | -88.5% | 30 | Compare |
 ExtraHop Networks Seattle, Washington | 4.6 | 68 | — | 9 | Compare |
 Blumira Ann Arbor, Michigan | 4.6 | 124 | -100.0% | 9 | Compare |
 Wireshark San Francisco, CA | 4.7 | 148 | — | 1 | Compare |
 Netgate Austin, US | 4.7 | 326 | -100.0% | 2 | Compare |
 Rapid7 Boston, MA | 4.3 | 245 | +200.0% | 25 | Compare |
 Trellix Plano, TX | 4.2 | 783 | +1200.0% | 18 | Compare |