Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Network Access Control (NAC)
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9.5% |
| Mid-Market | 38.1% |
| Enterprise | 52.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | — |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Powerful NAC Solution, Best Leveraged Within the Cisco Ecosystem
“As an implementer, centralized policy management is the biggest win — defining RADIUS, TACACS+, and 802.1x authorization rules in one place eliminates per-device configuration and makes policy audits straightforward. The deep Cisco ecosystem integration is equally valuable; pxGri”
Unifica y automatiza el acceso a la red con visibilidad real
“La capacidad de unificar y automatizar el acceso a la red mediante posturas de seguridad, cumpliendo condiciones previamente definidas, permite un perfilamiento y una visibilidad reales para identificar quién y qué se conecta a la red de la empresa.”
3 years of hands-on experience as an administrator managing Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) .
“With 3 years of experience administering Cisco ISE, I find its biggest strengths are centralized access control, strong security enforcement, and clear visibility into network activity. It simplifies managing user, device, and guest access while integrating well with other securi”