FolderManifest
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Document Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Organization
- Document Organization
- Efficiency
- Storage Solutions
- User Interface
Cons
- Missing Features
- UX Improvement
- Limited Customization
- Learning Curve
- Outdated Interface
- Slow Performance
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 94.7% |
| Mid-Market | 5.3% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 16 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 4.7 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Powerful Duplicate Detection for Large Projects
“It can detect duplicate files that has different name. This feature is very useful to find duplicate files in a large project.”
Effortless Project Organization and File Management
“What I appreciate most about FolderManifest is its ability to efficiently organize and summarize complex project folders. As a social researcher, I often deal with projects that contain numerous files and multiple duplicate versions. FolderManifest enables me to quickly grasp the”
Improving Workflow Through Better File Tracking
“I’ve found that when I’m working on multiple projects, FolderManifest’s review section really shines. For example, instead of digging through different folders to double-check versions of a report, I can quickly review everything in one place. That small shift has saved me from s”