AWS Security Hub
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Cloud Compliance
Pros and cons
Pros
- Security Protection
- Reporting
- Tools
- Integrations
- Compliance
- Easy Implementation
Cons
- Cost Management
- Expensive
- Learning Curve
- Complexity Issues
- Overwhelming Choices
- Inadequate Reporting
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24.1% |
| Mid-Market | 34.5% |
| Enterprise | 41.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 4.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Great for Automating Compliance Checks Against Industry Standards
“It is great at automating compliance checks against industry standards.”
Centralized Security Insights for AWS
“As someone who manages multi-account AWS environments and data pipelines, I appreciate how Security Hub centralizes security and compliance findings across services like GuardDuty, Inspector, and Macie. The automated compliance checks for CIS and PCI DSS are especially useful for”
A best all in one view of all my security logs to identify and corelate events.
“Eventhough other security services in aws helps me in aggregate logs from events, and Macie for compliace buf fortunalety to be proactive instead of being reactive always security hub seems pretty friedly choice. Implementation and integration are easy and well documented. No wor”