X-CD vs. Townhall (previously Townscript)
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | X-CD | Townhall (previously Townscript) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 10 | 117 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Ease of setup | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 100 | 81.981982 |
| Small Business | 80.0% | 72.6% |
| Mid-Market | 20.0% | 17.1% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 10.3% |
| Total page views | 134 | 260 |
| Total LLM citations | 11 | 474 |
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.
Townhall (previously Townscript)
Townhall is the world's first deep hybrid events technology platform. The company was founded with the vision that taking care of in-person and virtual attendees should not feel like running two different events. With its hybrid native technology, Townhall helps event organisers manage both in-person and virtual attendees on a single platform resulting in equal experience to both across all event needs such as Networking, Q&A, Speaker Sessions, Exhibition Booths, and more.
- Event Management
- Ease of Use
- Attendee Management
- Live Streaming
- Features
- Experience