X-CD vs. RegFox
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | X-CD | RegFox |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 10 | 572 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 9.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 100 | 83.215548 |
| Small Business | 80.0% | 77.1% |
| Mid-Market | 20.0% | 19.2% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 3.7% |
| Total page views | 134 | 1,148 |
| Total LLM citations | 11 | 6,323 |
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.
RegFox
Registration just got easier. Meet RegFox. RegFox has everything you need to drive signups, manage registrants, capture data and more starting at just $0.99 + 1% per registrant (capped at $4.99 per registrant). Perfect for conferences, camps, workshops, classes—you name it. We designed our software to be highly customizable, giving you the flexibility to have full branding control and also the features to back up your registration management.
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Registration Process
- Features
- Response Time
- Customization