X-CD vs. Jotform
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | X-CD | Jotform |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 10 | 5,792 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 100 | 78.793419 |
| Small Business | 80.0% | 75.1% |
| Mid-Market | 20.0% | 21.0% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 3.9% |
| Total page views | 134 | 14,937 |
| Total LLM citations | 11 | 55,800 |
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.
Jotform
Trusted by more than 35 million users worldwide, Jotform is an AI-powered online form builder designed to help individuals and organizations create, customize, and publish forms in minutes, from any device. With an intuitive drag-and-drop interface, Jotform makes it simple for anyone to build professional, mobile-responsive forms without writing a single line of code. As a fully no-code platform, Jotform empowers users to automate workflows, streamline data collection, and digitize processes.
- Ease of Use
- Simple
- Ease of Creation
- User-Friendly
- Features
- Form Creation