X-CD vs. haku
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | X-CD | haku |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 10 | 17 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 9.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 8.7 |
| NPS | 100 | 76.470588 |
| Small Business | 80.0% | 100.0% |
| Mid-Market | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 134 | 707 |
| Total LLM citations | 11 | 656 |
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.
haku
haku is an all-in-one platform for events, fundraising, marketing, and engagement, powering endurance events and nonprofit organizations. Established in 2013, we began by transforming endurance events with flexible technology that simplified management and drove growth. Since then, we’ve brought that same innovation to nonprofits — helping organizations power events, fundraising, marketing, and engagement so they can focus on impact, not fixing broken systems.
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Response Time
- Easy Creation
- Event Management