X-CD vs. Bizzabo
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | X-CD | Bizzabo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 10 | 448 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 9.1 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 8.5 |
| NPS | 100 | 53.061224 |
| Small Business | 80.0% | 38.0% |
| Mid-Market | 20.0% | 36.6% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 25.3% |
| Total page views | 134 | 2,428 |
| Total LLM citations | 11 | 26,386 |
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.
Bizzabo
Plan, deliver, and measure impactful events with Bizzabo's Event Experience OS. From intimate summits to 10,000+ attendee conferences, event organizers can streamline workflows, elevate attendee experiences, and capture the insights that matter. Recognized as a Leader in the 2025 GartnerⓇ Magic Quadrant™ and the only Customer Favorite in the 2024 Forrester Wave™, Bizzabo is trusted by the world’s top brands to deliver immersive experiences that connect and convert.
- Ease of Use
- Event Management
- Customer Support
- Attendee Management
- Easy Setup
- Features