X-CD vs. BigMarker
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | X-CD | BigMarker |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 10 | 444 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Ease of setup | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| NPS | 100 | 87.238979 |
| Small Business | 80.0% | 84.0% |
| Mid-Market | 20.0% | 11.9% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 4.1% |
| Total page views | 134 | 1,018 |
| Total LLM citations | 11 | 6,796 |
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.
BigMarker
BigMarker is the world's most customizable platform for webinars, virtual, and in-person events. We combine cutting-edge video technology with advanced marketing and interactive tools to deliver one-of-a-kind, fully branded event experiences. Thousands of companies worldwide trust BigMarker’s all-in-one platform to create immersive, interactive, and high-impact events. With seamless integrations, APIs, and white-label solutions, we empower organizations to embed interactive video experiences into their marketing, sales, and learning ecosystems.
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Webinars
- Customization
- Features
- Customizability