G2 Vendor Directory

WatchGuard AuthPoint vs. Instasafe ZTAA

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricWatchGuard AuthPoint

by WatchGuard

Instasafe ZTAA

by InstaSafe Technologies

Overall rating4.34.7
Review count12446
Ease of use8.99.3
Ease of setup8.09.3
Quality of support8.69.4
Meets requirements9.19.6
NPS59.77011586.363636
Small Business49.2%15.2%
Mid-Market46.8%54.3%
Enterprise4.0%30.4%
Total page views253164
Total LLM citations422183

WatchGuard AuthPoint

WatchGuard AuthPoint protects workforce logins to desktops, VPNs, and cloud applications, from Windows and macOS sign-in to Microsoft 365 and third-party SaaS. It runs on WatchGuard Cloud, the same console that manages WatchGuard network and endpoint security. An MSP or an IT team can cover identity without adding another vendor to the stack. When MFA alone is not enough Day-to-day authentication runs through the AuthPoint mobile app, with push, QR code, or one-time password. QR and OTP work when the device has no network connection.

Pros

    Instasafe ZTAA

    InstaSafe is redefining the challenge of secure access to modern networks by leveraging Zero Trust principles with its security solutions, that ensure seamless access to cloud applications, SAP applications, on-premise data, IoT devices, and multiple other neoteric use cases. Instasafe discards traditional VPN based conceptions of a network perimeter, instead moving the perimeter to the individual users and the devices they access. The Zero Trust approach followed by InstaSafe mandates a “never trust, always verify' approach to privileged access, without focusing on network locality.

    Pros