G2 Vendor Directory

VMware Live Recovery (VLR) vs. Arcserve Replication and High Availability (RHA)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricVMware Live Recovery (VLR)

by Broadcom

Arcserve Replication and High Availability (RHA)

by Arcserve

Overall rating4.54.0
Review count13612
Ease of use8.97.6
Ease of setup8.66.6
Quality of support8.78.0
Meets requirements8.97.6
NPS61.83206145.454545
Small Business18.4%16.7%
Mid-Market41.2%83.3%
Enterprise40.4%0.0%
Total page views223317
Total LLM citations21248

VMware Live Recovery (VLR)

Protect your data, minimize downtime and reduce costs with optimized disaster recovery (DR) that’s easily accessible on demand and delivered as a SaaS solution. VMware Live Recovery's ransomware recovery feature ensures confident ransomware recovery with a plan that rapidly restores critical apps and supports resiliency. Efficiently identify points of recovery to run rapid recovery point validations.

Pros

  • Recovery Ease
  • Ease of Use
  • Recovery Speed
  • Automation
  • Easy Setup
  • Easy Integrations

Arcserve Replication and High Availability (RHA)

Arcserve Replication and High Availability (RHA) ensures business continuity during unplanned disruptions by enabling real-time data replication and high availability for on-premises, remote, and cloud environments, by replicating data at the file system level for files, folders, applications, and full physical or virtual systems. Utilizing asynchronous replication technology, RHA maintains up-to-date replicas of mission-critical systems, including Windows and Linux applications, across physical servers, VMware, Hyper-V, Amazon EC2, and Microsoft Azure environments.

Pros