Security testing vs. Packetlabs
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Security testing | Packetlabs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 15 | 28 |
| Ease of use | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Ease of setup | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Quality of support | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Meets requirements | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| NPS | 66.666667 | 96.428571 |
| Small Business | 40.0% | 35.7% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 46.4% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 17.9% |
| Total page views | 9 | 380 |
| Total LLM citations | 4 | 1,119 |
Security testing
Helps to know where you have problems in Quality Assurance process
Packetlabs
Most penetration tests stop at automated vulnerability scans and a few exploit attempts. We don’t. Packetlabs has completed over 2,500 engagements, delivering CREST-accredited, SOC 2 Type II attested penetration testing and adversary simulation for organizations that need proof of real risk, with verified findings, clear remediation, and no false positives. Our in-house team uses a 95% manual testing approach to uncover real attack paths, validate exploitability, and connect findings to business impact.