Triplebyte Screen vs. Filtered
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Triplebyte Screen | Filtered |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 39 | 16 |
| Ease of use | 9.7 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 10.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.5 | 9.6 |
| NPS | 59.459459 | 93.75 |
| Small Business | 51.3% | 33.3% |
| Mid-Market | 38.5% | 40.0% |
| Enterprise | 10.3% | 26.7% |
| Total page views | 14 | 28 |
| Total LLM citations | 16 | 38 |
Triplebyte Screen
Resumes are unreliable indicators of true technical skills. Use Triplebyte's data-backed assessment to identify skilled applicants before wasting time in tech screens. Screen uses Triplebyte’s standardized, data-backed technical assessments to measure applicants’ actual technical skills. This can help reduce wasted interviews and find hidden gems from underrepresented backgrounds. We built the assessment using data from 200,000+ interviews at 1,000+ companies and trained it using advanced ML techniques.
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.