Triplebyte Screen vs. CodeSubmit
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Triplebyte Screen | CodeSubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 39 | 14 |
| Ease of use | 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 7.7 |
| Quality of support | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 8.5 | 8.3 |
| NPS | 59.459459 | 100 |
| Small Business | 51.3% | 85.7% |
| Mid-Market | 38.5% | 14.3% |
| Enterprise | 10.3% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 14 | 55 |
| Total LLM citations | 16 | 154 |
Triplebyte Screen
Resumes are unreliable indicators of true technical skills. Use Triplebyte's data-backed assessment to identify skilled applicants before wasting time in tech screens. Screen uses Triplebyte’s standardized, data-backed technical assessments to measure applicants’ actual technical skills. This can help reduce wasted interviews and find hidden gems from underrepresented backgrounds. We built the assessment using data from 200,000+ interviews at 1,000+ companies and trained it using advanced ML techniques.
CodeSubmit
Make Better Hiring Decisions With Take-Home Coding Challenges With CodeSubmit, you Identify great candidates using real tasks, not brainteasers. Streamline your tech recruiting workflow and hire the right person for the job.