Trace vs. Persefoni
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Trace | Persefoni |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 15 | 11 |
| Ease of use | 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Ease of setup | 9.8 | 6.7 |
| Quality of support | 9.9 | 9.7 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 100 | 90.909091 |
| Small Business | 60.0% | 27.3% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 63.6% |
| Enterprise | 6.7% | 9.1% |
| Total page views | 192 | 341 |
| Total LLM citations | 606 | 2,687 |
Trace
Leading Australian companies use Trace to meet their ASRS and AASB S2 reporting obligations with confidence. Trace brings together purpose-built software and expert-led delivery, from climate risk assessments to emissions data to assurance-ready disclosures, so reporting is accurate, repeatable and audit-ready.
- Sustainability
- Features
- Innovation
- Analytics
- Ease of Use
- Intuitive
Persefoni
Persefoni is a leading provider of carbon accounting and sustainability management software, headquartered in the United States and serving organizations globally. Founded in 2020, Persefoni helps companies of all sizes, from high-growth brands to multinational enterprises and large financial institutions, navigate the rapidly evolving landscape of sustainability reporting and climate disclosure.