Trace vs. osapiens
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Trace | osapiens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 15 | 254 |
| Ease of use | 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Ease of setup | 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Quality of support | 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 100 | 59.288538 |
| Small Business | 60.0% | 16.5% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 28.9% |
| Enterprise | 6.7% | 54.6% |
| Total page views | 192 | 2,111 |
| Total LLM citations | 606 | 9,481 |
Trace
Leading Australian companies use Trace to meet their ASRS and AASB S2 reporting obligations with confidence. Trace brings together purpose-built software and expert-led delivery, from climate risk assessments to emissions data to assurance-ready disclosures, so reporting is accurate, repeatable and audit-ready.
- Sustainability
- Features
- Innovation
- Analytics
- Ease of Use
- Intuitive
osapiens
osapiens combines compliance and supplier intelligence in a single AI platform, helping companies manage risk and become more resilient. The osapiens HUB brings together more than 25 solutions across seven product suites, enabling companies to centrally manage supplier relationships, compliance, and supply chains, and to optimize maintenance, service, and distribution. More than 2,500 customers worldwide, from SMEs to global enterprises, trust osapiens, headquartered in Mannheim, Germany.
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Features
- Implementation Ease
- Helpful
- Innovation