Trace vs. Energy Elephant
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Trace | Energy Elephant |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 15 | 35 |
| Ease of use | 9.9 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 9.8 | 9.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.9 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 100 | 74.285714 |
| Small Business | 60.0% | 17.6% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 47.1% |
| Enterprise | 6.7% | 35.3% |
| Total page views | 192 | 242 |
| Total LLM citations | 606 | 558 |
Trace
Leading Australian companies use Trace to meet their ASRS and AASB S2 reporting obligations with confidence. Trace brings together purpose-built software and expert-led delivery, from climate risk assessments to emissions data to assurance-ready disclosures, so reporting is accurate, repeatable and audit-ready.
- Sustainability
- Features
- Innovation
- Analytics
- Ease of Use
- Intuitive
Energy Elephant
Energy intelligence and management software platform and lots more. EnergyElephant helps organizations manage energy, waste and water. It covers buildings, vehicles and other assets. It helps to create and centralize data across cost, consumption and carbon, all in one simple to use place. With over $3 billion in energy/sustainability costs managed to date and used in over 80 countries globally, EnergyElephant believes that everyone can achieve great energy and sustainability outcomes without needing to be an expert.
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Efficiency Improvement
- Features
- Data Management
- Reporting