Trace vs. Carbonfact
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Trace | Carbonfact |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 15 | 16 |
| Ease of use | 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 9.8 | 8.6 |
| Quality of support | 9.9 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 100 | 100 |
| Small Business | 60.0% | 0.0% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 75.0% |
| Enterprise | 6.7% | 25.0% |
| Total page views | 192 | 69 |
| Total LLM citations | 606 | 267 |
Trace
Leading Australian companies use Trace to meet their ASRS and AASB S2 reporting obligations with confidence. Trace brings together purpose-built software and expert-led delivery, from climate risk assessments to emissions data to assurance-ready disclosures, so reporting is accurate, repeatable and audit-ready.
- Sustainability
- Features
- Innovation
- Analytics
- Ease of Use
- Intuitive
Carbonfact
Carbonfact is the only fashion-specific Carbon Accounting and Product-LCA platform that helps brands and manufacturers discover the exact sources of their environmental impact and take actionable steps to reduce their footprint. With the Carbonfact tool, you can run detailed and accurate life cycle assessments (LCAs) in a fraction of the time and cost of traditional methods. From key emission drivers across the value chain to product design decisions, our platform provides you with the insights you need to lower your environmental impact.
- Ease of Use
- Efficiency Improvement
- Document Management
- Features
- Customization
- Customer Support