ThreeSixty vs. X-CD
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | ThreeSixty | X-CD |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 2.9 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 17 | 10 |
| Ease of use | 5.3 | 9.1 |
| Ease of setup | 5.0 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 5.8 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 6.4 | 9.6 |
| NPS | -37.5 | 100 |
| Small Business | 17.6% | 80.0% |
| Mid-Market | 58.8% | 20.0% |
| Enterprise | 23.5% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 27 | 134 |
| Total LLM citations | 15 | 11 |
ThreeSixty
The ThreeSixty Association Management System (AMS) is the market’s most robust and flexible solution for enterprise associations and nonprofits looking for a technology infrastructure that supports their unique processes and complex workflows. We help these organizations drive revenue growth and operational precision by delivering a power foundation that can be customized to meet their needs today and in the future with a modern and extendable, browser-based interface.
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.