Thoropass Pentesting vs. Packetlabs
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Thoropass Pentesting | Packetlabs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 20 | 28 |
| Ease of use | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Ease of setup | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Quality of support | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Meets requirements | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| NPS | 75 | 96.428571 |
| Small Business | 70.0% | 35.7% |
| Mid-Market | 30.0% | 46.4% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 17.9% |
| Total page views | 153 | 380 |
| Total LLM citations | 4 | 1,119 |
Thoropass Pentesting
Thoropass offers expert-led, audit-ready penetration testing with tailored scoping, thorough manual testing, and clear remediation guidance. Backed by CREST-accredited specialists, Thoropass delivers high-quality reports and unlimited retesting to help teams improve security and meet compliance requirements efficiently. Ideal for organizations needing reliable testing across web, mobile, API, network, cloud, and AI/LLM environments.
Packetlabs
Most penetration tests stop at automated vulnerability scans and a few exploit attempts. We don’t. Packetlabs has completed over 2,500 engagements, delivering CREST-accredited, SOC 2 Type II attested penetration testing and adversary simulation for organizations that need proof of real risk, with verified findings, clear remediation, and no false positives. Our in-house team uses a 95% manual testing approach to uncover real attack paths, validate exploitability, and connect findings to business impact.