G2 Vendor Directory

Testpad vs. Testworthy

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricTestpad

by Testpad

Testworthy

by Testworthy

Overall rating4.34.6
Review count2622
Ease of use8.99.1
Ease of setup9.38.9
Quality of support8.69.3
Meets requirements8.79.3
NPS5677.272727
Small Business57.7%19.0%
Mid-Market26.9%66.7%
Enterprise15.4%14.3%
Total page views9215
Total LLM citations2377

Testpad

Test plans, not test cases. Testpad is built on a different data model. Instead of a suite of test cases, each one a form to fill in with preconditions, steps and expected results, a plan is an outline of prompts. You write a test as a line of plain text, indent to group related tests under a heading, and add a column for each run you do. Established over 16 years ago, customers have included the likes of NVIDIA, GitHub, Bell, Siemens, Sony, HP, and Volvo. It's fast to work in. Type a line, hit enter, write the next one, instead of opening a multi-field form for every test.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Test Cases
  • User Interface
  • Organization
  • Intuitive UI
  • Customizability

Testworthy

Our vision is to help organisations create maximum desired impact with our quality assurance software. The mission is to ensure the development of high-quality software products, without compromising on speed, collaboration or agility. Testworthy is a comprehensive, robust automated software testing tool, which allows organisations to plan and execute thorough testing on their products, enabling a seamless and hassle-free experience to their customers.

Pros